Department of Water Resources California Water News: Water Quality 1/11/10

Kettleman City group will sue if landfill takes radioactive waste

Hanford Sentinel-1/8/10

By Seth Nidever

 

A group of Kettleman City residents called People for Clean Air and Water announced Thursday it will sue if necessary to block Chemical Waste Management Inc.'s plans to ship nuclear waste to its landfills a few miles southeast of the town.

 

The group contends that the Chem Waste facility would violate its own permit if it received the waste.

 

No landfill in California is permitted to accept radioactive nuclear waste. Chem Waste officials acknowledge as much, but point to an initial ruling by the Department of Public Health last year that the company can accept radioactive material from the defunct Santa Susana Field Laboratory, a joint rocket research facility formerly run by Boeing and NASA that produced significant quantities of radioactive material.

 

The health department ruled that the waste is allowed under a special executive order issued by then Gov. Gray Davis in 2002. Still, other state agencies, including the Department of Toxic Substances Control, haven't yet approved the shipments.

 

But Chem Waste officials argue that they can accept the shipments pending a final ruling from DTSC.

That has angered members of the environmental group, who point to repeated statements by Chem Waste officials that the facility does not take radioactive waste.

 

Members are also concerned about a rash of birth defects in Kettleman City last year. Many link the defects to the Chem Waste landfills a few miles away, though no definitive evidence has emerged to suggest such a link.

 

Anger has also been prompted by the Kings County Board of Supervisors' decision in December to approve an expansion of the landfills' hazardous waste capacity. Supervisors gave their approval despite also formally requesting that the state investigate possible links between the landfills and the recent birth defects.

 

"Chem Waste's plan to bring radioactive waste into Kettleman City is unconscionable, especially when our community is struggling to cope with so many health problems. There is a reason why radioactive waste disposal is banned in California -- it's not safe for our communities, our families or our children," said Maricela Mares-Alatorre, a spokeswoman for the group.#

 

http://hanfordsentinel.com/articles/2010/01/11/news/doc4b477d1f60e03772101633.txt

 

 

Some firms beset by probes get stimulus funds

S.F. Chronicle-1/10/10

By Will Evans, California Watch

Opinion

 

Large corporations working in California have reaped tens of millions of dollars in new federal stimulus funds despite previous pollution violations, criminal probes and allegations of fraud, a California Watch investigation has found.

 

A major apartment owner based in Denver stands to benefit from $13 million in stimulus tax credits to rehabilitate its housing complex in Los Angeles. This federal assistance comes after the company, AIMCO, paid $3 million in 2004 to settle a lawsuit with the city of San Francisco over complaints that it operated mold- and rodent-infested buildings that posed serious safety hazards to residents of the city's Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood. Residents continue to complain about AIMCO's management.

 

Granite Construction of Watsonville received $6.4 million in stimulus contracts to work on airport runways in Salinas and Monterey, and to repair roads in San Bernardino, Riverside and Butte counties. Yet the company faces three federal probes, including a criminal investigation into whether it fraudulently overcharged the city of San Diego in the wake of the devastating 2007 wildfires.

 

And residents in Ventura County say they are dismayed that airplane and defense giant Boeing received a $15.9 million stimulus contract for environmental monitoring at the same site near Simi Valley where the company was fined for polluting a creek with chromium, dioxin, lead and mercury. A local resident and opponent, Dawn Kowalski, called the new contract "the fox guarding the hen house."

 

To government watchdogs, these contracts and others raise concerns about the way the massive federal stimulus program is being administered. Although most major companies in America face lawsuits and regulatory action, these government reformers say a contractor's history should be considered before doling out more money to the same firms.

 

"It is very upsetting that the government doesn't do more due diligence before it hands money out," said Laura Chick, California's inspector general for stimulus funds. "We've gotten very used to handing out taxpayer dollars and not so good at overseeing to whom are we giving them and how they are being spent."

 

The federal government has directed stimulus funds, in the form of tax credits, to create low-income housing across the state. AIMCO - in a joint venture with the nonprofit Foundation for Affordable Housing - was offered $13 million in tax credits to help fix up its senior housing apartment complex in Los Angeles. An AIMCO spokeswoman said the company has yet to accept the stimulus tax credit and contends the project "represents the company's continued commitment to meeting the critical need for affordable housing."

 

But in the Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood in San Francisco, residents have complained for years of slumlord conditions and bad management at the AIMCO apartment complexes. "We trust them as far as we can throw them - that's the general rule when it comes to AIMCO," said Sara Shortt, director of the Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, a nonprofit tenants-rights organization.

 

The city of San Francisco sued AIMCO, saying that the company ignored more than two dozen orders to fix scores of health and safety hazards, including stairways and landings collapsing from dry rot as well as moldy, water-damaged ceilings and walls. Inspectors cited a blocked fire escape and lack of smoke detectors. They also found broken windows and doors and faulty plumbing. AIMCO settled the suit for $3 million in 2004.

 

Resident Dorothy Peterson said she was considering protesting the stimulus assistance to AIMCO. "If they really wanted to make sure that low-income housing was built properly and for residents that were going to be treated like human beings, then they would not give it to an AIMCO," she said.

 

But AIMCO's partner on the Los Angeles project vouches for the company. "They're huge," said Deborrah Willard, president of the Foundation for Affordable Housing, based in Southern California. "When you're huge and you own this many units, you're bound to make somebody unhappy somewhere along the line."

 

Granite Construction picked up several stimulus contracts - which were distributed through Caltrans and various local agencies - despite being at the center of a fraud scandal in San Diego, where many residents feel the company took advantage of the city in a time of crisis.

 

"As a taxpayer, I would be more than a little frustrated with that, given the track record here in this city," said Jan Rasmussen, a San Diego resident and outreach coordinator of Rancho Bernardo United, a community group that helps victims of the 2007 wildfires.

 

The city of San Diego sued Granite Construction and another company, A.J. Diani, in 2008 for separately allegedly overbilling for their debris removal services after the disaster. The city claimed both companies billed with "falsified records" that overestimated the amount of debris they had cleared, and inflated their costs. The lawsuit is on hold pending a criminal probe by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

 

Granite also faces two U.S. Department of Justice investigations. One targets an Oregon construction project where storm runoff dumped dirt into various creeks, possibly harming the fish population. The other investigation focuses on allegations that a joint venture run by Granite in Minnesota failed to hire enough minority businesses as subcontractors and misrepresented those efforts.

 

A Granite spokeswoman, Jacque Fourchy, said the company is open about its legal problems in corporate filings and disputes wrongdoing in San Diego. "It's unfortunate," Fourchy said, "that this investigation continues to plague us because we really feel like we didn't do anything wrong."

One stimulus contract through the Department of Energy is causing consternation in the rugged foothills above Simi Valley in Ventura County.

 

The toxic contamination at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory has been a painfully sore subject to locals for decades. Since the 1940s, the lab was operated by divisions of North American Aviation, which eventually became Rockwell International. It was the site of rocket engine testing and nuclear power development that led to toxins leaching into the dirt and groundwater and a partial nuclear meltdown in 1959.

 

Boeing acquired the aerospace divisions of Rockwell International in 1996, but community activists said Boeing has been fighting its responsibility for pollution that occurred before and after the purchase. A group of local residents sued Boeing, contending that the company caused cancer. The company settled for $30 million in 2005.

 

The regional water quality board fined Boeing $471,000 in 2007 for 79 pollution violations that let wastewater and storm runoff from the site ooze toxins into various creeks flowing downstream to the Los Angeles River.

 

Boeing had discharged 118.5 million gallons of water laced with pollutants including chromium, lead and mercury, according to the water board. At one point, the company exceeded the allowable concentration of cancer-causing dioxin by 6,900 times. The water board said the chronic violations created a risk to public health and, given Boeing's resources and sophistication, were "exceedingly serious."

 

Dan Hirsch, president of a California nuclear watchdog group, doesn't believe Boeing should have been rewarded with federal stimulus money for environmental monitoring there. The contract for Boeing, which made $2.7 billion in profits in 2008, was not bid competitively. "How can one have federal taxpayer money going to a company that is responsible for the contamination and is resisting the cleanup?" Hirsch said.

 

Boeing said it has made significant progress on the cleanup. "Boeing is fully committed to cleaning up the site in a manner that fully protects public health and the environment," wrote spokeswoman Kamara Sams in an e-mail to California Watch. She said Boeing, NASA and the Department of Energy are responsible for cleaning up portions of the property.

 

Jen Stutsman, an Energy Department spokeswoman, responded by e-mail that Boeing has the expertise to perform the work and a good track record of working with the agency. "Changing contractors would only cost the taxpayer additional money as a new contractor arrived and took over the work for Boeing," she wrote. The project was reported to have created 11 jobs.

 

At the same time, Boeing is trying to overturn a California toxic cleanup law. On Nov. 13, Boeing sued in federal court to invalidate SB990, which holds the Ventura County cleanup to especially strict standards. Boeing claims the California-mandated standards are unnecessary and the excavation required would further destroy the "ecological habitat."

 

State Assemblywoman Julia Brownley, D-Santa Monica, who represents nearby residents, said she's concerned that Boeing is getting stimulus money and "almost in the same breath" is suing against California cleanup standards. "Something just seems not right in that picture," she said.#

 

California Watch is a project of the Center for Investigative Reporting with offices in the Bay Area and Sacramento.

 

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/10/MN4V1BF1B4.DTL&tsp=1

 

 

ChemTreat Inc. Acquires Trident Technologies, Inc.

BusinessWire-1/11/10

 

ChemTreat Inc. announced that it has acquired Trident Technologies, Inc. and Trident Technologies S.A. de C.V., leading providers of water treatment products and services in Southern California and northwestern Mexico.

 

“We are creating a new and dynamic force within the Southern California and Mexican Industrial and Commercial & Industrial water treatment markets.”

Trident Technologies, headquartered in San Diego, CA, provides water treatment solutions for a diverse range of commercial, institutional and industrial markets. Unique product and service offerings concentrate on water and resource management with particular focus on “Green” technologies.

 

ChemTreat is one of the largest providers of industrial water treatment in the United States with revenues in excess of $250 million. As part of the Water Quality Group of Danaher Corporation, ChemTreat/Trident joins Hach, Trojan and other companies in the growing sector of the water market.

 

John Nygren, ChemTreat’s President, said: “We are creating a new and dynamic force within the Southern California and Mexican Industrial and Commercial & Industrial water treatment markets.”#

 

http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20100111005134&newsLang=en

 

 

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DWR’s California Water News is distributed to California Department of Water Resources management and staff,  for information purposes, by the DWR Public Affairs Office. For reader’s services, including new subscriptions, temporary cancellations and address changes, please use the online page: http://listhost2.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news . DWR operates and maintains the State Water Project, provides dam safety and flood control and inspection services, assists local water districts in water management and water conservation planning, and plans for future statewide water needs. Inclusion of materials is not to be construed as an endorsement of any programs, projects, or viewpoints by the Department or the State of California.